As a teenager, i used to watch a lot of animated japanese films on VHS. My school friend Anders used to order them from the UK, and i bought some, especially Doomed Megalopolis. I remember having all 4 episodes on VHS, and i can´t tell you how many times i watched them. I loved Doomed Megalopolis, where the animation looked wonderful. Director Rintaro ( real name Hayashi Shigeyuki ), have directed a lot of anime films in many years, and i still consider Doomed Megalopolis to be one of the highlights of his career. I also enjoyed his film Metropolis, released in 2001. It may not be a film many anime fans talk about, but it is definitely worth seeing. Since my friend Anders had a very big collection of anime films, and constantly bought new releases, i remember seeing the film Ghost In The Shell in his VHS shelves. I instantly became curious what this film was all about. This film, based on the manga comic, written and illustrated by Masamune Shirow, turned out to be a wonderful adaptation of the comics. The film, released in 1995, is directed by Mamoru Oshii, and is one of the best animated films out there. Ghost In The Shell was ground breaking, because it was very original, and looked very different from many other animated films. I have seen it is out on blu ray, so i will eventually get myself a copy, since this is a cult classic. I did see the sequel called Ghost In The Shell: Innocence, released in 2004. If you enjoyed the first film, i think you will enjoy this sequel as well. The sequel is a bit different from the first film, but it does not fail as a sequel. Then we ha a film called Ghost In The Shell: The New Film, released only 2 years ago. I have not seen this one, but i will eventually at some point. Since i have been a Manga fan since my childhood, i was pretty excited when Paramount Pictures announced that a film adaptation of the classic Ghost In The Shell was going to be released, with Scarlett Johansson in the lead role. This did make me curious, how were they going to be able to turn the world of Ghost In The Shell into a feature film, with a much bigger budget and professional actors ? I remember reading that director Rupert Sanders have been chosen as the director, who actually did well with his debut feature film Snow White And The Huntsman. Since i did not know what to expect, when Hollywood is doing a feature film on such a classic anime film, i had to see this film. With a great cast, and with very strong ground material for a feature film, is Ghost In The Shell better then i expected, or is this another example of when Hollywood make bad choices, such as the remake of Ghostbusters ?
In the near future, the majority of humans are augmented with cybernetics, enhancing various traits like vision, strength and intelligence. Hanka Robotics, the world´s leading developer of augmentative technology, establishes a secret project to develop a mechanical body, or " shell ", that can integrate a human brain. Mira Killian ( Scarlett Johansson ), a young woman who is the solve survivor of a cyberterrorist attack that killed her parents. She is chosen as the test subject after her body can not be repaired. Mira´s designer, Dr Ouelet ( Juliette Binoche ) does not like this project, but is forced to make Mira a perfect weapon, from the orders of CEO Hanka Cutter ( Peter Ferdinando ). A year later, Mira has attained the rank of Major in the anti-terrorist bureau Section 9, working with operatives Batou ( Pilou Asbaek ) and Togusa ( Chin Han ) under Chief Daisuke Aramaki ( Takeshi Kitano ). The team successfully thwarts a terrorist attack on a Hanka business conference, and Major Mira destroy a rouge mechanical geisha after it murders a hostage. Mira have been experiencing hallucinations that Dr Ouelet dismisses as glitches. For some reason, no one does not seem to be telling the truth to Mira, about her past. But as she digs into information, she is about to discover much more than she expected.
Since i was a bit skeptical going into the cinema, i was afraid that the trailer only showed the best parts of the film. Thankfully, i enjoy this film adaption. And i would like to say that there are a couple of reasons why i enjoy this film. The cinematography by Jess Hall ( who worked on several good british films, such as Son Of Rambow and Hott Fuzz ), have done a wonderful job with this film. The futuristic look of the film looks really lovely. You can sense that he have tried to capture the feeling of the original anime film. Scarlett Johansson in the lead role as Major Mira Killian is a really good choice, and she definitely does a great performance, both physical and emotional. Some of the majestic city scenes looks really gorgeous, especially when Major Mira sky dive off buildings. Nice to see legendary actor Juliette Binoche here as Dr. Ouelet. This may not be one of her better performances, but i still like to see her in a completely different genre film, compared to what she usually does, european drama productions. Let´s not forget legendary japanese actor Takeshi Kitano ( who have done some really good films, especially Hanna-bi from 1997 ). His character in Ghost In The Shell, known as Daisuke Aramaki is tough, and one of the most interesting characters on screen. I am not sure if you will notice this, but i somehow felt that this film had some elements from the cult classic 1982 film Blade Runner in some scenes. Director Rupert Sanders have proved with this film adaptation that you can do a film, based on anime and make it almost look like an animated world. Everything is not perfect, but i think the transformation shows that he really tried to make this film, to please the fans of the original anime film. The CGI effects looks for the most part really good, and you would love to see more of this world. Is there anything negative ? I suppose some of the dialogue scenes does not feel very interesting, as if they are placed there to fill out some empty spots. As a science fiction action film, Ghost In The Shell have plenty to offer, not only for fans of the original anime film. The action scenes with Scarlett Johansson is exactly what we need in cinemas, rough, violent and really good looking. Since this film have flopped in box office numbers, under performing in China as well, i am not sure if we will ever see a sequel. Too bad, i think that would have been interesting. But i suggest you go see Ghost In The Shell in cinemas, until it stops showing in cinemas pretty soon. It is worth the ticket price, and who does not want to see Scarlett Johansson in tight outfits ? Exactly, we all do.
Rating: DDD
fredag 12 maj 2017
torsdag 11 maj 2017
Prevenge
If there is one thing more dangerous than anything in this world ( a part of the Dansband religious cult members ), it must be pregnant women. If you say no to a pregnant woman, and she does not agree, the following things might happen.
* She might break your nuts into 1,4 million pieces.
* She will force you to buy a glamorous house, or she will burn your cd collection of Ronan Keating ( we all know you guys have his collection )
How can i know all of this ? Well, in my family, several women have been pregnant, and they followed these 2 rules. I think pregnant women know that men love Ronan Keating more than anything in this world, that´s why it is our weak spot. If my wife burned all my Ronan cd´s, i would not be a man anymore. That´s how much he means to all men worldwide. He knows our emotions, and fill our hearts with the passion we want more of.
So....let´s get back to pregnant women. To see women carrying a child is of course a miracle. Every woman who carry their child have a very wonderful time to look forward too. And with this comes a lot of responsibility of course. There are many films, where pregnancy is brought up in different situations. Since we have so many titles to choose between, in all genres, i have chosen one particular title called Inside, released in 2007. A really well made horror film, with really good acting, especially from the main actors Beatrice Dalle and Alysson Paradis. To make the story short, what the film is about, a pregnant woman is visited by a stranger, who wants to take her unborn baby from her. A creepy, very disturbing film, that was actually one of my favourite horror films of the year 2007. Worth buying on dvd, or blu ray, if you have not seen it. Pregnant women on film is of course a very sensitive subject, but since it is a very natural way of life, there are many stories to tell on film. Some do it more traditional, while some directors try and choose a different path. And this is where i came across the new british film called Prevenge. I have read about this film in several reviews, and it seemed to be an unusual concept of a comedy slasher. I did notice that this was the directorial debut film for actor Alice Lowe, a british actor that we have seen in some really good films, such as Hot Fuzz, Sightseers and The World´s End. She is the main actor of this film Prevenge, and directed this film as well. Since she have done some wonderful performances in the past, is this one of her best films, or should she have made another awful Hugh Grant romantic comedy instead, that no one asked for ?
Ruth ( Alice Lowe ) is a pregnant woman. Her partner ( the father of her unborn child ) died in a climbing accident, leaving Ruth to handle her pregnancy alone. But Ruth is convinced that her baby, is telling her to kill people. And she does, whenever the baby orders her to do it. But is it really the baby that control the mind of Ruth, or does these killings have another explanation ?
British humor is of course one of the best things in this world. So many great british comedies out there, and so many really funny films to choose between. Prevenge is sort of a dark comedy, with horror influences, and it is also a bit disturbing. Your child in your belly telling you to kill new victims, have you ever seen that before ? Or is it her other voices telling her what to do? If you don´t like what you´re reading about this film, then this is not going to change your mind. I think this is a film for those who appreciate odd films, with different influences from british humor with some disturbing twists. And i appreciate the mix, because i can´t say i have seen this combination before, especially with a pregnant woman. Alice Lowe does a really good job as the mentally disturbed Ruth. Her journey throughout the film have plenty of dark comedy scenes, and it feels very strange laughing when some bloody brutality happens. But maybe that´s the point with this film, it is not a typical british comedy. It is supposed to be different, and that is a good sign for me. Since Alice Lowe is also the director of Prevenge, i think she have done a special film that can´t be compared with anything out there this year. And for that she has to be respected, she clearly don´t want to make everything traditional. When you actually find out more about Ruth´s past, you soon begin to understand what might have made her gone insane. The natural characters through out the film, help the film feel natural. And if you are in the right mood, be prepared to laugh when you least expect it. Prevenge is definitely one of the most odd films i have experienced this year, so far. And i appreciate a director that take chances, and dare to move outside the mainstream film clichés, and do something unusual. Does it have flaws? Perhaps, but i don´t really bother about them, since i think this film succeed to give us something different. If you did see the film Sightseers, and you enjoyed that film, then i suggest you watch Prevenge as well. Two different films, but both worth a watch. I am not sure if some pregnant mothers want to see this film, but for those of you who are curious, go for it. This should be a film shown on dvd for a house filled with pregnant mothers, just so they feel prepared to become mothers, when the time comes. Well done Alice Lowe, looking forward for your next film.
Rating: DDD
Here is a link to the scandinavian release of this film, out now all over the internet stores.
http://www.njutafilms.com/prevenge-dvd/
* She might break your nuts into 1,4 million pieces.
* She will force you to buy a glamorous house, or she will burn your cd collection of Ronan Keating ( we all know you guys have his collection )
How can i know all of this ? Well, in my family, several women have been pregnant, and they followed these 2 rules. I think pregnant women know that men love Ronan Keating more than anything in this world, that´s why it is our weak spot. If my wife burned all my Ronan cd´s, i would not be a man anymore. That´s how much he means to all men worldwide. He knows our emotions, and fill our hearts with the passion we want more of.
So....let´s get back to pregnant women. To see women carrying a child is of course a miracle. Every woman who carry their child have a very wonderful time to look forward too. And with this comes a lot of responsibility of course. There are many films, where pregnancy is brought up in different situations. Since we have so many titles to choose between, in all genres, i have chosen one particular title called Inside, released in 2007. A really well made horror film, with really good acting, especially from the main actors Beatrice Dalle and Alysson Paradis. To make the story short, what the film is about, a pregnant woman is visited by a stranger, who wants to take her unborn baby from her. A creepy, very disturbing film, that was actually one of my favourite horror films of the year 2007. Worth buying on dvd, or blu ray, if you have not seen it. Pregnant women on film is of course a very sensitive subject, but since it is a very natural way of life, there are many stories to tell on film. Some do it more traditional, while some directors try and choose a different path. And this is where i came across the new british film called Prevenge. I have read about this film in several reviews, and it seemed to be an unusual concept of a comedy slasher. I did notice that this was the directorial debut film for actor Alice Lowe, a british actor that we have seen in some really good films, such as Hot Fuzz, Sightseers and The World´s End. She is the main actor of this film Prevenge, and directed this film as well. Since she have done some wonderful performances in the past, is this one of her best films, or should she have made another awful Hugh Grant romantic comedy instead, that no one asked for ?
Ruth ( Alice Lowe ) is a pregnant woman. Her partner ( the father of her unborn child ) died in a climbing accident, leaving Ruth to handle her pregnancy alone. But Ruth is convinced that her baby, is telling her to kill people. And she does, whenever the baby orders her to do it. But is it really the baby that control the mind of Ruth, or does these killings have another explanation ?
British humor is of course one of the best things in this world. So many great british comedies out there, and so many really funny films to choose between. Prevenge is sort of a dark comedy, with horror influences, and it is also a bit disturbing. Your child in your belly telling you to kill new victims, have you ever seen that before ? Or is it her other voices telling her what to do? If you don´t like what you´re reading about this film, then this is not going to change your mind. I think this is a film for those who appreciate odd films, with different influences from british humor with some disturbing twists. And i appreciate the mix, because i can´t say i have seen this combination before, especially with a pregnant woman. Alice Lowe does a really good job as the mentally disturbed Ruth. Her journey throughout the film have plenty of dark comedy scenes, and it feels very strange laughing when some bloody brutality happens. But maybe that´s the point with this film, it is not a typical british comedy. It is supposed to be different, and that is a good sign for me. Since Alice Lowe is also the director of Prevenge, i think she have done a special film that can´t be compared with anything out there this year. And for that she has to be respected, she clearly don´t want to make everything traditional. When you actually find out more about Ruth´s past, you soon begin to understand what might have made her gone insane. The natural characters through out the film, help the film feel natural. And if you are in the right mood, be prepared to laugh when you least expect it. Prevenge is definitely one of the most odd films i have experienced this year, so far. And i appreciate a director that take chances, and dare to move outside the mainstream film clichés, and do something unusual. Does it have flaws? Perhaps, but i don´t really bother about them, since i think this film succeed to give us something different. If you did see the film Sightseers, and you enjoyed that film, then i suggest you watch Prevenge as well. Two different films, but both worth a watch. I am not sure if some pregnant mothers want to see this film, but for those of you who are curious, go for it. This should be a film shown on dvd for a house filled with pregnant mothers, just so they feel prepared to become mothers, when the time comes. Well done Alice Lowe, looking forward for your next film.
Rating: DDD
Here is a link to the scandinavian release of this film, out now all over the internet stores.
http://www.njutafilms.com/prevenge-dvd/
fredag 5 maj 2017
Salt And Fire
I am a big fan of documentary films, especially films that tell a story on true stories, or real personalities. I think it all started for me when i saw Michael Moore´s really well made documentay film Bowling For Columbine, back in 2002. This film had some very interesting topics, especially about why ammunition is so easy to get in stores, and why America have so much more murders than in Canada, and many other subjects within the gun issues. Of course the film also focused on the Columbine massacre, a shootout no one will forget. Michael Moore continued to deliver very strong documentary films. But in 2005, i discovered a documentary film that basically changed my life. I watched director Werner Herzog´s documentary film Grizzly Man, about an odd american man named Timothy Treadwell. He was a bear enthusiast who lived in Alaska, to document the lives of grizzly bears. Unfortunately, he was found eaten by one bear. A man who spend so many years, trying to live with bears and understand them, could not escape the fact that they are animals. They have animal instincts, and attack no matter how nice you are. The documentary film Grizzly Man is a very strong and emotional film. You found out so much interesting facts about the life if Timothy Treadwell, and why he was so passioned about living in nature close to grizzly bears. Director Werner Herzog really digged deep into this story and gave us a film that is unforgettable. If you have not seen it, try and find it online to watch, or buy the dvd. Director Werner Herzog have directed many documentary films over the years, and he have also made feature films with big Hollywood stars. One example of his work, is of course his classic vampire film Nosferatu The Vampire from 1979. This was of course long before he made Grizzly Man, and his first big step into a Hollywood film was the film Rescue Dawn with actor Christian Bale. A good film in my opinion, and he decided to do his next film with Nicolas Cage called Bad Lieutenant: Port Of Call New Orleans. I actually thought this was a remake of the classic 1992 film with Harvey Keitel, but according to director Werner Herzog, his film is more of a re-imagining of the original film from the 90´s. I have not seen his film Queen Of The Desert with Nicole Kidman from 2015, but i read it was supposed to be ok. So here we are, with the latest film from director Werner Herzog, a film called Salt And Fire. I have not seen a trailer, or barely read about this film before i decided to see it, just to make it more fun. Is the legendary director back with a powerful film, or is this a film you might as well avoid ?
Three ecologists , Dr. Laura Sommerfeld ( Veronica Ferres ), Dr. Fabio Cavani ( Gael Garcia Bernal ) and Dr. Arnold Meier ( Volker Michalowski ) are sent to South America as part of a U.N. investigation into an ecological disaster of Salar de Uyni. As they arrive at the airport, they are kidnapped by CEO Matt Riley ( Michael Shannon ) and his armed men. Matt´s company is responsible for the ecological disaster. As a volcano nearby begin to show signs of erupting, Matt needs the ecologists help, to try and take control in this difficult situation.
Every director can make films, where some films are really good, and other choices may not turn out in a positive way. And this is where we find Salt And Fire. Considering that this film is directed by legendary documentary film maker Werner Herzog, you would expect him to deliver a strong story. You would also expect him to deliver a strong cast, giving us solid acting. Unfortunately, Salt And Fire feels very weak compared to his previous work. It is as if Werner just decided to get a good cast, but don´t really give them any interesting characters. Just look at some of the names in this cast, such as Michael Shannon, Veronica Ferres, Gael Garcia Bernal and Volker Michalowski. All of them have been in some really good films, and we know they are great actors. So why don´t they seem to care about their characters ? This might actually be one of the few times where i see Michael Shannon make a bad performance, and i love him as an actor. Take Shelter, Midnight Special, Mud, Before The Devil Knows You´re Dead, a list of really good films that he have been a part of. My only guess why these actors agreed to do this film, is because of their respect for director Werner Herzog. They might have been passionate about the story, but on screen you can´t really feel any connections between their characters. It is like they just say their lines, and walk around. Even if the kidnapping is supposed to be the intensive part of the film, is delivered without any passion. The story could have been interesting, since it is a story of a ecological disaster in Bolivia. But somehow, director Werner Herzog decides to go very light on this subject, and tell a story that you don´t really care about. Werner and Michael Shannon have worked together before, in the thriller My Son, My Son, What Have Ye Done. This is actually a good film, with a very nice cast. I honestly don´t know what went wrong with Salt And Fire, there must be an explanation. Maybe the project did not turn out the way Werner thought it would do, or maybe he just wanted to make a film just to get cash. I have no idea what happened. All i know is that Salt And Fire is not a film worthy such a great cast, and a great director. A few scenes give a glimpse of what could have developed into something interesting, but eventually you don´t really care. Not an awful film all the way, but still a big disappointment. I really hope director Werner Herzog come back with his next film, with a much more structured film. Well all make mistakes sometimes, hopefully Werner regret this film and can look into the future instead.
Rating: DD
Three ecologists , Dr. Laura Sommerfeld ( Veronica Ferres ), Dr. Fabio Cavani ( Gael Garcia Bernal ) and Dr. Arnold Meier ( Volker Michalowski ) are sent to South America as part of a U.N. investigation into an ecological disaster of Salar de Uyni. As they arrive at the airport, they are kidnapped by CEO Matt Riley ( Michael Shannon ) and his armed men. Matt´s company is responsible for the ecological disaster. As a volcano nearby begin to show signs of erupting, Matt needs the ecologists help, to try and take control in this difficult situation.
Every director can make films, where some films are really good, and other choices may not turn out in a positive way. And this is where we find Salt And Fire. Considering that this film is directed by legendary documentary film maker Werner Herzog, you would expect him to deliver a strong story. You would also expect him to deliver a strong cast, giving us solid acting. Unfortunately, Salt And Fire feels very weak compared to his previous work. It is as if Werner just decided to get a good cast, but don´t really give them any interesting characters. Just look at some of the names in this cast, such as Michael Shannon, Veronica Ferres, Gael Garcia Bernal and Volker Michalowski. All of them have been in some really good films, and we know they are great actors. So why don´t they seem to care about their characters ? This might actually be one of the few times where i see Michael Shannon make a bad performance, and i love him as an actor. Take Shelter, Midnight Special, Mud, Before The Devil Knows You´re Dead, a list of really good films that he have been a part of. My only guess why these actors agreed to do this film, is because of their respect for director Werner Herzog. They might have been passionate about the story, but on screen you can´t really feel any connections between their characters. It is like they just say their lines, and walk around. Even if the kidnapping is supposed to be the intensive part of the film, is delivered without any passion. The story could have been interesting, since it is a story of a ecological disaster in Bolivia. But somehow, director Werner Herzog decides to go very light on this subject, and tell a story that you don´t really care about. Werner and Michael Shannon have worked together before, in the thriller My Son, My Son, What Have Ye Done. This is actually a good film, with a very nice cast. I honestly don´t know what went wrong with Salt And Fire, there must be an explanation. Maybe the project did not turn out the way Werner thought it would do, or maybe he just wanted to make a film just to get cash. I have no idea what happened. All i know is that Salt And Fire is not a film worthy such a great cast, and a great director. A few scenes give a glimpse of what could have developed into something interesting, but eventually you don´t really care. Not an awful film all the way, but still a big disappointment. I really hope director Werner Herzog come back with his next film, with a much more structured film. Well all make mistakes sometimes, hopefully Werner regret this film and can look into the future instead.
Rating: DD
Viral
Even if humans have an incredible body, we can´t protect ourselves from everything. Especially certain viruses, where we need medical help. Viruses can cause some big problems to humans, unless we know a cure. But then you have more dangerous viruses, where it is much harder to find a cure. And this is something that many people worldwide are trying to find ways, to make sure that we are safe from airborne bacteria and viruses. There are plenty of films, that have tried to brought up different subjects, about viruses. And one of the films i still remember, is the 1995 film Oubreak, with Dustin Hoffman and Rene Russo. The film tells the story, of aw very dangerous outbreak of a virus called Motaba. The virus is originally from the African jungle in 1967. They thought that they destroyed the virus, but it returns in Zaire, where people become very ill and die. This complicated situation between virologists and experts becomes very tricky, trying to work together, makes the film very interesting. How do you handle a situation as dangerous as this, without taking any dangerous risks ? I saw the film in cinema back in the 90´s, and i remember how curious i was about the most dangerous viruses. I also remember the 2007 film called Rec, a spanish horror film, about a virus outbreak that turn people into insane zombies. Not the typical zombie film actually, because this film is more focused on the outbreak of the virus. And a really well made horror film as well, from director James Balagueró and Paco Plaza. I highly recommend you see the sequel Rec 2 as well, actually the sequel might be even better than the first film. There are of course other films, based on virus outbreaks that follow pretty much the same pattern. But i like to see different stories, based on both true events, or fictional stories. I almost forgot to mention Steven Soderberghs film Contagion, a really good thriller about a dangerous virus disease, that tries to show that we can´t always be prepared for unexpected turns. Since i watch many films every month, i usually miss some titles now and then, that have been released on dvd or blu ray. And this is where i decided to pick up a blu ray called Viral. Described to be a science fiction horror drama ( that´s a lot of combinations ). I have not really heard much about Viral before, so it is always more fun seeing a film you know very little about, so you don´t have to have high expectations. Is this a cool throwback to classic parasites films, or is Viral a film that is so dull you will fall asleep instantly ?
Emma Drakeford ( Sofia Black-D´Elia ) and Stacey Drakeford ( Analeigh Tipton ) are two young sisters, living in a nice clean neighborhood. One day at school, one of the students turns out to be infected, by an unknown virus. Emma and Stacey leave school and head home. They manage to get in contact with their father, but he tells them to stay at home and lock themselves inside. They decide to head towards a party, not far away from their parents house. One of the infected manage to attack the party guests, and now the situation is much more serious. Emma and Stacey head back home, hoping that things will calm down and the virus will eventually be defeated. But no one really knows how to handle the infected, and more civilians are in danger.
It is very clear from the very beginning of Viral, that we have seen films like this before. So, you can´t expect to see anything really original here. I can probably mention a few films that looks similar to Viral, without trying to compare them. But the good news is, that Viral do have some positive turns to offer. Imagine another version of Robert Rodriguez classic 90´s film The Faculty, but with some different elements where parasites are included, and you have Viral served on a plate. This is sort of a throwback to the Invasion Of The Body Snatchers from the 70´s as well, where people suddenly change and attack for no reason at all. The classic 70´s film is a very interesting view on how vulnerable humans are, especially if our bodies are taken over by another life form. The 1993 remake Body Snatchers was of course mostly laughable, as it was trying to be adjusted for the teenage audience. And this is where Viral actually succeed, this is a horror film made for teenagers, but it is not terrible. As most of you know, films made with college teenagers are usually very predictable and dull. Viral on the other hand, turn this around for a bit. Sure, there are a few scenes we get some clichés, but overall i enjoyed myself. Lead actors Sofia Black-D´Elia and Analeigh Tipton are actually not bad. Their characters Emma and Stacey feel natural, and not the perfect teenage girls image. One of the few issues i have, is that the outbreak itself does not really tell you much. You get some details through out the film, but too little to actually feel that chaos is around the corner. Directors Henry Joost and Ariel Schuman both directed the technology thriller Nerve, that i reviewed last year. They may not make this film as good as Nerve, but i still feel that Viral is smarter than most teenage horror films. There is not a lot of blood here, or flesh wounds, it is more about how to survive against infected people and how to avoid them. Viral is no classic in any way, or can win against the classic Invasion Of The Body Snatchers. Still, nice to see that some directors try to keep the parasite franchise alive, in present day. I am probably one of the few who have seen this film so late, since it has been out for quite some time, but what the hell, you can´t see them all at the release. Give Viral a chance, if you love science fiction horror. I better load my shotgun, just in case those damn parasites attack again from the Jehovas Witnesses center.
Rating: DDD
Emma Drakeford ( Sofia Black-D´Elia ) and Stacey Drakeford ( Analeigh Tipton ) are two young sisters, living in a nice clean neighborhood. One day at school, one of the students turns out to be infected, by an unknown virus. Emma and Stacey leave school and head home. They manage to get in contact with their father, but he tells them to stay at home and lock themselves inside. They decide to head towards a party, not far away from their parents house. One of the infected manage to attack the party guests, and now the situation is much more serious. Emma and Stacey head back home, hoping that things will calm down and the virus will eventually be defeated. But no one really knows how to handle the infected, and more civilians are in danger.
It is very clear from the very beginning of Viral, that we have seen films like this before. So, you can´t expect to see anything really original here. I can probably mention a few films that looks similar to Viral, without trying to compare them. But the good news is, that Viral do have some positive turns to offer. Imagine another version of Robert Rodriguez classic 90´s film The Faculty, but with some different elements where parasites are included, and you have Viral served on a plate. This is sort of a throwback to the Invasion Of The Body Snatchers from the 70´s as well, where people suddenly change and attack for no reason at all. The classic 70´s film is a very interesting view on how vulnerable humans are, especially if our bodies are taken over by another life form. The 1993 remake Body Snatchers was of course mostly laughable, as it was trying to be adjusted for the teenage audience. And this is where Viral actually succeed, this is a horror film made for teenagers, but it is not terrible. As most of you know, films made with college teenagers are usually very predictable and dull. Viral on the other hand, turn this around for a bit. Sure, there are a few scenes we get some clichés, but overall i enjoyed myself. Lead actors Sofia Black-D´Elia and Analeigh Tipton are actually not bad. Their characters Emma and Stacey feel natural, and not the perfect teenage girls image. One of the few issues i have, is that the outbreak itself does not really tell you much. You get some details through out the film, but too little to actually feel that chaos is around the corner. Directors Henry Joost and Ariel Schuman both directed the technology thriller Nerve, that i reviewed last year. They may not make this film as good as Nerve, but i still feel that Viral is smarter than most teenage horror films. There is not a lot of blood here, or flesh wounds, it is more about how to survive against infected people and how to avoid them. Viral is no classic in any way, or can win against the classic Invasion Of The Body Snatchers. Still, nice to see that some directors try to keep the parasite franchise alive, in present day. I am probably one of the few who have seen this film so late, since it has been out for quite some time, but what the hell, you can´t see them all at the release. Give Viral a chance, if you love science fiction horror. I better load my shotgun, just in case those damn parasites attack again from the Jehovas Witnesses center.
Rating: DDD
onsdag 3 maj 2017
The Void
If there is one thing i do not always enjoy, is CGI effects in films. There are of course films that have really good special effects, but then we have really expensive films with CGI effects, that are really awful. How many of you remember the disaster film After Earth with Will Smith ? That film is a really good example of how a lot of money was wasted for nothing. Another good example is of course Catwoman with Halle Berry. It could be one of the worst films based on a comic book characters ever. In some films you need to have really well made CGI effects, because it would not be possible to make every film with practical effects. But in the old days of film making, you had to do everything with practical effects. You could use animation of course, in some scenes, just to fill in the blank spots. But at the end of the day, practical effects were always more fun to watch. Now days most film makers rely on CGI, because you can pretty much do anything with computers. But true film makers, who really love making films, they use practical effects. Just look at the Evil Dead films, director Sam Raimi brought us some really fantastic practical effects, thanks to make up artist Tom Sullivan ( who made the make up in the first film ), while Greg Nicotero did the make up effects for the other 2 films. There are a ton of horror films that have delivered a lot of fun practical effects, but my point is that i always prefer a horror film to be made in an old school way. There is something special about seeing practical made monsters, aliens, or whatever we get to see. Independent film makers who prefer to make films, in an old school way, is of course always welcome. It is a hard business out there, and i respect new film makers that dare to go against the main stream concept. One good example of a practical effects horror film, that is not very old, is the Irish horror film The Hallow by director Corin Hardy. The creature effects, combined with the creepy Irish forest areas worked really well. Nice to see actor Joseph Mawle in a lead role, and i think he did really well. I suggest you buy a dvd or blu ray of this film, it is worth having in your collection. About a few weeks before christmas of 2016, i was reading online about an upcoming horror film called The Void. What i noticed especially was that this was supposed to be a film, made with as much practical effects as possible. This made me very curious of course . As the film came out in Sweden a couple of weeks ago on VOD and dvd, i threw myself on to check it out. Is this a gore fest for old school horror fans, or is this pure garbage ?
Police officer Daniel Carter ( Aaron Poole ) is just about to head towards the police station, when a mysterious man named James ( Evan Stern ) crawls out of the forest. He seems to be injured, so Daniel drives him to the nearest hospital. James is put to sleep, since he is hysterious. While Daniel takes a walk around the hospital, a patient is murdered by a completely insane nurse. No one knows what made her kill a patient, but suddenly it seems that a mysterius religious cult is surrounding the hospital, while the dead turn into strange creatures. What is going on ? Who are these people outside ?
I have actually watched The Void 3 times now on VOD. Why ? Because when you get a film like The Void, and you love old school practical effects, then you are served with a big feast. This is the kind of horror film you should enjoy, if you love Hellraiser. Imagine the nightmare style of Clive Barker, mixed with what seems to be a religious cult, and you can probably imagine that this is the perfect summer party. The practical effects make this film so much fun, because it reminds us of John Carpenter´s classic The Thing, but still manage to throw in some original ideas. Another detail i also enjoy about this film is that the acting is actually not bad. Most of the cast actually acts pretty good, how often do you see that in a B horror movie ? Especially from actors Aaron Poole and Daniel Fathers, they both have strong characters. I would also like to say that legendary actor Kenneth Welsh delivers with his character Dr. Richard Powell. The Void may not sound very unique if you read about the plot, but once you get into the darkness, you will experience something i can´t really explain. Transformed dead people, who turn into different creatures, looks just the way you want them to be. The location, set at a hospital, filled with different personalities may be a bit cliché, but if you can forgive this part then you won´t be disappointed. Simple details such as the religious cult clothes, works with the concept. They look creepy, with the triangle mark across their covered faces. The unexpected turns is also something positive, you can´t really figure out what will happen ( for the most part ), and this is also something to be positive about. Is this an original film ? Yes and no, it depends on how you look at some scenes. Some details do feel fresh, while some details feels like something we have seen before. Either way, i can´t say that The Void disappointed me in any way. Directors Jeremy Gillespie and Steven Kostanski have managed to deliver something special, and i have to say that they did a really good job. This is so far the best horror film i have seen this year, and i really hope people rent this film, or buy it, to show support independent film makers. Did the trailer of Fifty Shades Darker make you feel sick, or even become demon possessed ? Then i have some good news for you. The Void will make you sing, and dance, on every single street, because this is the happiest film you will see this spring. With so much gore, blood, and violence that this film give the audience, there are no excuses why you can´t buy the blu ray. Run down to your local film store and get The Void.
Rating: DDDD
Police officer Daniel Carter ( Aaron Poole ) is just about to head towards the police station, when a mysterious man named James ( Evan Stern ) crawls out of the forest. He seems to be injured, so Daniel drives him to the nearest hospital. James is put to sleep, since he is hysterious. While Daniel takes a walk around the hospital, a patient is murdered by a completely insane nurse. No one knows what made her kill a patient, but suddenly it seems that a mysterius religious cult is surrounding the hospital, while the dead turn into strange creatures. What is going on ? Who are these people outside ?
I have actually watched The Void 3 times now on VOD. Why ? Because when you get a film like The Void, and you love old school practical effects, then you are served with a big feast. This is the kind of horror film you should enjoy, if you love Hellraiser. Imagine the nightmare style of Clive Barker, mixed with what seems to be a religious cult, and you can probably imagine that this is the perfect summer party. The practical effects make this film so much fun, because it reminds us of John Carpenter´s classic The Thing, but still manage to throw in some original ideas. Another detail i also enjoy about this film is that the acting is actually not bad. Most of the cast actually acts pretty good, how often do you see that in a B horror movie ? Especially from actors Aaron Poole and Daniel Fathers, they both have strong characters. I would also like to say that legendary actor Kenneth Welsh delivers with his character Dr. Richard Powell. The Void may not sound very unique if you read about the plot, but once you get into the darkness, you will experience something i can´t really explain. Transformed dead people, who turn into different creatures, looks just the way you want them to be. The location, set at a hospital, filled with different personalities may be a bit cliché, but if you can forgive this part then you won´t be disappointed. Simple details such as the religious cult clothes, works with the concept. They look creepy, with the triangle mark across their covered faces. The unexpected turns is also something positive, you can´t really figure out what will happen ( for the most part ), and this is also something to be positive about. Is this an original film ? Yes and no, it depends on how you look at some scenes. Some details do feel fresh, while some details feels like something we have seen before. Either way, i can´t say that The Void disappointed me in any way. Directors Jeremy Gillespie and Steven Kostanski have managed to deliver something special, and i have to say that they did a really good job. This is so far the best horror film i have seen this year, and i really hope people rent this film, or buy it, to show support independent film makers. Did the trailer of Fifty Shades Darker make you feel sick, or even become demon possessed ? Then i have some good news for you. The Void will make you sing, and dance, on every single street, because this is the happiest film you will see this spring. With so much gore, blood, and violence that this film give the audience, there are no excuses why you can´t buy the blu ray. Run down to your local film store and get The Void.
Rating: DDDD
söndag 30 april 2017
Logan
Marvel Comics have made changed many people lives. Especially comic book lovers, who collect comic books and dream about being one of their favourite comic book characters. The transformation from a comic book, to a film adaptation, is of course never easy to do. But i think a lot of talented directors have managed to lift some of the comic book characters we all love, and delivered solid entertainment.There are of course a lot of titles we could choose from, and a lot to discuss. Let´s go back in time to the year 2000. This was the year when director Bryan Singer gave us his view on the world of X-Men. As a first film, this was a really well made action film, and one of the characters that everyone was talking about was of course Wolverine, played by actor Hugh Jackman. He had the looks, and the right elements to be Wolverine, and he clearly enjoyed doing this character. Hugh continued to work on a lot of X-Men films, and i can without a doubt say that Wolverine would always be a character that stayed strong throughout the film series. Over the years, each film have presented us with a lot of different mutant characters, and i think it is interesting to get to know all these characters. One of the things i think every X-Men film have managed to do, in different ways, is to deliver comic book action scenes, where we get some nice treats. But in 2009, the X-Men franchise would get a different perspective, when the film is more based on the life of Wolverine. This was an interesting idea, even though i don´t think this film had the same quality level as the previous films. There were of course discussions, when we would see Hugh Jackman in his own character Wolverine film, and we finally got it in The Wolverine, released in 2013. I have to say, i love the fact that this film takes place in Japan, to see Wolverine fight Yakuza gangsters is just lovely. There is also a different view from Wolverine´s perspective, than in the X-men films, that make this film interesting. I highly recommend you see this film on blu ray, with some nice special features. After The Wolverine was released, there were rumors that Hugh Jackman was planning to end making films with the character Wolverine. And it seemed that the next film, simply called Logan, would be the final chapter. So here we are, with the latest film with this legendary character. I am not sure if this will be the last we will see of Hugh Jackman as the legendary mutant, but of course i had to check this out. Is this the most strongest portrait of Wolverine, or is this just a film made, to make money at the box office but without any passion for this genre ?
The year is 2029. Mutants are on the brink of extinction, with no new mutants being born in 25 years. James " Logan " Howlett ( Hugh Jackman ), formaly known as Wolverine, is now working as a limousine driver in Texas. He drinks everyday, and his health is not in a good condition. His adamantium skeleton is poising him. Logan lives in an abandoned smeldon plant, with mutant tracker Caliban ( Stephen Merchant ) and Charles Xavier ( Patrick Stewart ), who is suffering from Alzheimer´s disease. This causes some serious problems, where Charles can´t control his telepathic abilities. Logan is approached by a woman called Gabriela Lopez ( Elizabeth Rodriguez ). She is a nurse for the biotechnology corporation Alkali-Transigen, who wants Logan to escort her and her 11 year old girl Laura Kinney ( Dafne Keen ) to a place in North Dakota called " Eden ". Unfortunately, as Logan accept the job, and go to pick her up, he discover that Gabriela have been murdered. Someone seems to be after Laura, and Logan has to escape with the girl, and Charles Xavier ( Patrick Stewart ). Transigen´s cybernetically-enchanced chief of security Donald Pierce ( Boyd Holbrook ), and his enforces are on Logan´s trail, as they want Holly back.
Since i have followed the X-Men films, ever since the year 2000, i have experienced some really good highlights, and most films have been really good. I would say that every film had something specific to tell each story, both about the characters, but also about the mutant world. I think so far, my personal favourite has to been X-Men: Days Of Future Past. It looked fantastic, had a really strong cast, and a really interesting story set in the 70´s. Logan is more like The Wolverine film, but perhaps a much deeper personal look into his life. There is a lot of dramatic scenes, where you can clearly see that Logan is having a difficult time in his life. He drinks, his health is not what it used to be, but somehow he will not give up. Hugh Jackman is of course really good as Logan, and i can´t imagine how anyone else would do this character better than him. One difference with this film, compared to the X-Men films, is that you get much more deeper view on this broken mutants soul. Also, some of the fighting scenes with the Wolverine claws are really raw, and i love that. One of the most interesting details in this film, is of course the introduction to the mutant character Laura Kinney ( X-23 ), played by actor Dafne Keene. If this is supposed to be her introduction to her own film ( in the future ), she does a really good start. I actually think the character Laura Kinney is one of the more interesting characters, very mysterious. Knowing she is the daughter of Logan, makes you curious to find out more about her life. Patrick Stewart is of course guaranteed to deliver a solid performance, as Charles Xavier. The story takes place out in Texas, and i like the dirty, desert areas, surrounding the loneliness of Wolverine. It gives the film a different approach, because it would a perfect location to hide from the outside world, in deserted desert buildings. Director James Mangold have directed a lot of films in his career, and one of the films i consider to be one of his best is the 1997 classic Cop Land. It is one of the best performances you have ever seen Sylvester Stallone do in his career. James actually directed The Wolverine, so he knows his material. And you can tell he really want to try and make a majestic approach in this film, and he definitely knows what he is doing. To combine drama, and pure action, is hard. Especially if you try and make a story that feels interesting. And this is where Logan actually manage to hit the jackpot. A few scenes feel a bit drawn out, but as a Wolverine film, i am not disappointed. A really well made action film, with a lot to say. If this is the final film of Wolverine and Hugh Jackman, fans will be pleased, i know i am.
Rating: DDDD
The year is 2029. Mutants are on the brink of extinction, with no new mutants being born in 25 years. James " Logan " Howlett ( Hugh Jackman ), formaly known as Wolverine, is now working as a limousine driver in Texas. He drinks everyday, and his health is not in a good condition. His adamantium skeleton is poising him. Logan lives in an abandoned smeldon plant, with mutant tracker Caliban ( Stephen Merchant ) and Charles Xavier ( Patrick Stewart ), who is suffering from Alzheimer´s disease. This causes some serious problems, where Charles can´t control his telepathic abilities. Logan is approached by a woman called Gabriela Lopez ( Elizabeth Rodriguez ). She is a nurse for the biotechnology corporation Alkali-Transigen, who wants Logan to escort her and her 11 year old girl Laura Kinney ( Dafne Keen ) to a place in North Dakota called " Eden ". Unfortunately, as Logan accept the job, and go to pick her up, he discover that Gabriela have been murdered. Someone seems to be after Laura, and Logan has to escape with the girl, and Charles Xavier ( Patrick Stewart ). Transigen´s cybernetically-enchanced chief of security Donald Pierce ( Boyd Holbrook ), and his enforces are on Logan´s trail, as they want Holly back.
Since i have followed the X-Men films, ever since the year 2000, i have experienced some really good highlights, and most films have been really good. I would say that every film had something specific to tell each story, both about the characters, but also about the mutant world. I think so far, my personal favourite has to been X-Men: Days Of Future Past. It looked fantastic, had a really strong cast, and a really interesting story set in the 70´s. Logan is more like The Wolverine film, but perhaps a much deeper personal look into his life. There is a lot of dramatic scenes, where you can clearly see that Logan is having a difficult time in his life. He drinks, his health is not what it used to be, but somehow he will not give up. Hugh Jackman is of course really good as Logan, and i can´t imagine how anyone else would do this character better than him. One difference with this film, compared to the X-Men films, is that you get much more deeper view on this broken mutants soul. Also, some of the fighting scenes with the Wolverine claws are really raw, and i love that. One of the most interesting details in this film, is of course the introduction to the mutant character Laura Kinney ( X-23 ), played by actor Dafne Keene. If this is supposed to be her introduction to her own film ( in the future ), she does a really good start. I actually think the character Laura Kinney is one of the more interesting characters, very mysterious. Knowing she is the daughter of Logan, makes you curious to find out more about her life. Patrick Stewart is of course guaranteed to deliver a solid performance, as Charles Xavier. The story takes place out in Texas, and i like the dirty, desert areas, surrounding the loneliness of Wolverine. It gives the film a different approach, because it would a perfect location to hide from the outside world, in deserted desert buildings. Director James Mangold have directed a lot of films in his career, and one of the films i consider to be one of his best is the 1997 classic Cop Land. It is one of the best performances you have ever seen Sylvester Stallone do in his career. James actually directed The Wolverine, so he knows his material. And you can tell he really want to try and make a majestic approach in this film, and he definitely knows what he is doing. To combine drama, and pure action, is hard. Especially if you try and make a story that feels interesting. And this is where Logan actually manage to hit the jackpot. A few scenes feel a bit drawn out, but as a Wolverine film, i am not disappointed. A really well made action film, with a lot to say. If this is the final film of Wolverine and Hugh Jackman, fans will be pleased, i know i am.
Rating: DDDD
tisdag 25 april 2017
Hey kids, gather round, i got some great news for all of you who love Steven Seagal ( the man waving his arms every 5 minutes )
Yes, it has been a long time since i actually have seen a Steven Seagal film.
Actually, i might have reviewed one film in here, years ago, and of course it was a pile of shit.
So i have this idea, why not review one of Steven Seagal´s more latest films ?
I know kids, you are all screaming :- Yeeeeaaah, you´re the best Danny Boy
Yes, i know i am. But thanks!
So he have a film called The Perferct Weapon out on dvd and blu ray, that is supposed to be a science fiction action film ( hold on a second, Seagal in sci fi ? ).
Yes, you read that right. Steven Seagal is now making his way to science fiction, and that has to be a masterpiece.....right ?
Before i watch this film, i will finish a review of the latest Wolverine film Logan, and Seagal will show up later, probably in the beginning in May.
So remember kids, once Steven Seagal shows up, you just want more.
Cheers from Daniel - The Swede That Knows Everything You Need To Know
Actually, i might have reviewed one film in here, years ago, and of course it was a pile of shit.
So i have this idea, why not review one of Steven Seagal´s more latest films ?
I know kids, you are all screaming :- Yeeeeaaah, you´re the best Danny Boy
Yes, i know i am. But thanks!
So he have a film called The Perferct Weapon out on dvd and blu ray, that is supposed to be a science fiction action film ( hold on a second, Seagal in sci fi ? ).
Yes, you read that right. Steven Seagal is now making his way to science fiction, and that has to be a masterpiece.....right ?
Before i watch this film, i will finish a review of the latest Wolverine film Logan, and Seagal will show up later, probably in the beginning in May.
So remember kids, once Steven Seagal shows up, you just want more.
Cheers from Daniel - The Swede That Knows Everything You Need To Know
Prenumerera på:
Inlägg (Atom)